Following this methodology almost all of the symbols identified were wired for

Following this methodology almost all of the symbols identified were wired for sound. See chapter 2, sections 2.1 to 2.5 in http://rosetta-stone.etf.ukim.edu.mk/

References:

http://rosetta-stone.etf.ukim.edu.mk/

Part 10 – Conclusion

Even though Boshevski and Tentov were able to give sound to almost all of the symbols they identified, their greatest challenge will be to (a) break down the entire string of symbols into words and (b) find meaning for these words. Boshevski and Tentov believe the center text does not have the exact same meaning as the other two texts because its target audience is the Macedonian ruling class, not the enslaved Egyptian and Greek classes. Even so, the other two texts provide enough clues for the center text translation to be verified once it is all translated. 167 words translated to date out of more than 1,600 words may not seem like much but this is only the beginning. I have been assured by Dr. Tentov that more has been done since the initial publication and this will be an ongoing project until the entire text is fully translated. I have also been told that more publications will be forthcoming revealing more of the text’s mystery.

So what exactly do the 167 words reveal and how can we be sure that they are Macedonian?

Once the syllabic alphabet was established and cataloged (see chapter 2 in http://rosetta-stone.etf.ukim.edu.mk/) Boshevski and Tentov began to apply it against the 167 patterns identified and thus derived the “Ancient Macedonian” words from them.

I must mention at this point that a lot of the words identified by Boshevski and Tentov are prefixes, suffixes and prepositions surrounding the universal symbols for “God” “|||”, “Masters” “///”, “Snake” “אּ” (the written form of capital N) and all the names mentioned in the text. Although the universal symbols have the same meaning (i.e. boga, gosp, god, deo, dieu, theos, etc.) in all languages, the prefixes, suffixes and prepositions are syllabic words with sounds that have meaning in the Macedonian language. Thus by applying the syllabic alphabet created from the center text against the symbols surrounding the universal symbols mentioned above, Boshevski and Tentov came up with words such as the following examples;

Ancient Macedonian

Nashe ime name Naj nashe ime most significant name Zheveni lived Najzheveni living Bozhen Sei Honourable Imo Lto Ltoi Summers Shemo Shi Nashbe Zheve Zheveto living Detsa Naitse Respected Boga Se Zeus Sei Sevo (brightness) Sea Shi Nasha Nelea Naloze (picture) Norejtsa Samo

Modern Macedonian

Nashe ime

Naj nashe ime

Dolgo Zhiven

Najdolgo zhiven

Bozhestven Naochit

Ime Leto Leta

Sveshtenik Kamen Kamena Gradba Zhivo Zhivoto

Detsa Naitsenet

Bogot na Svetlinata

Svetli Svetlina

Svetla Shi Nasha Statua Slika (narez)

Retski Samo

English

Our

Our

Long

Forever

Divine

Name Summer

Priest Stone Temple Alive The

Children Most

The God

Bright Light

Lights Stone Our Statue Image

Scribes Only

Napoia Nadeshe I A Igje Vv Naagiupto Nasinajseive Danajve Toj Nazeven Nanze Necklace Moj (Mine) Mo Voj Jvi Na Bde Ata Nasenine Successor

Kukja House Nadesh Hope I And A But Negoviot His Vo In, On Egipet Egypt Na Sinaj site Sinai Danajtsi Danai Toj He Narechen Called Naniza

Moj My

Jas I Vie You Javi Decree Na To Da bide To be Tatko Father Naslednik

And so on.

NOTE: I just want to mention that I received an exceptional numbers of e-mails regarding the Rosetta stone series of essays with inquiries and comments, unfortunately a large number were negative comments, especially the ones from Greek individuals.

To you I just want to say that what Boshevski and Tentov are doing is first and foremost scientific research. If Boshevski and Tentov are in error or on the wrong track or in any direction described by your derogatory terms then so be it. Let the experts decide and be the judges of their work.

It is not my place or yours, for that matter, to judge someone’s work without first understanding it just because it does not agree with my or your current beliefs or political position. Yes, what Boshevski

and Tentov are doing may be going against the grain for most just like those few who did some centuries ago in support of a round earth when everyone believed the earth was flat. If Boshevski and Tentov turn out to be wrong so be it, I’d rather see them be wrong than give up because people out there feel that they are an embarrassment.

For your information no new discoveries are ever found at first try or by taking the safe route and doing nothing. There are thousands if not millions of researchers out there who are trying to discover new things every day and maybe if they are lucky, one in a thousand will be successful. If we want our scientists to continue to work and achieve results we need to encourage them by giving them our support, not our unfounded criticism.

“It is better to try and fail, than not to try at all!”